Paper detail

Enhanced H2O formation through dust grain chemistry in X-ray exposed environments

The ULIRG Mrk 231 exhibits very strong water rotational lines between λ= 200-670μm, comparable to the strength of the CO rotational lines. High redshift quasars also show similar CO and H2O line properties, while starburst galaxies, such as M82, lack these very strong H2O lines in the same wavelength range, but do show strong CO lines. We explore the possibility of enhancing the gas phase H2O abundance in X-ray exposed environments, using bare interstellar carbonaceous dust grains as a catalyst. Cloud-cloud collisions cause C and J shocks, and strip the grains of their ice layers. The internal UV field created by X-rays from the accreting black hole does not allow to reform the ice. We determine formation rates of both OH and H2O on dust grains, having temperature T_dust=10-60 K, using both Monte Carlo as well as rate equation method simulations. The acquired formation rates are added to our X-ray chemistry code, that allows us to calculate the thermal and chemical structure of the interstellar medium near an active galactic nucleus. We derive analytic expressions for the formation of OH and H2O on bare dust grains as a catalyst. Oxygen atoms arriving on the dust are released into the gas phase under the form of OH and H2O. The efficiencies of this conversion due to the chemistry occurring on dust are of order 30 percent for oxygen converted into OH and 60 percent for oxygen converted into H_2O between T_dust=15-40 K. At higher temperatures, the efficiencies rapidly decline. When the gas is mostly atomic, molecule formation on dust is dominant over the gas-phase route, which is then quenched by the low H2 abundance. Here, it is possible to enhance the warm (T> 200 K) water abundance by an order of magnitude in X-ray exposed environments. This helps to explain the observed bright water lines in nearby and high-redshift ULIRGs and Quasars.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.