Paper detail

Enhanced fracture toughness in ceramic superlattice thin films: on the role of coherency stresses and misfit dislocations

Superlattice (SL) thin films composed of refractory ceramics unite extremely high hardness and enhanced fracture toughness; a material combination often being mutually exclusive. While the hardness enhancement obtained whentwo materials form a superlattice is well described by existing models based on dislocation mobility, the underlying mechanisms behind the increase in fracture toughness are yet to be unraveled. Here we provide a model based on linear elasticity theory to predict the fracture toughness enhancement in (semi-)epitaxial nanolayers due to coherency stresses and formation of misfit dislocations. We exemplarily study a superlattice structure composed of two cubic transition metal nitrides (TiN, CrN) on a MgO (100) single-crystal substrate. Minimization of the overall strain energy, each time a new layer is added on the nanolayered stack, allows estimating the density of misfit dislocations formed at the interfaces. The evolving coherency stresses, which are partly relaxed by the misfit dislocations, are then used to calculate the apparent fracture toughness of respective SL architectures by applying the weight function method. The results show that the critical stress intensity increases steeply with increasing bilayer period for very thin (essentially dislocation-free) SLs, before the K_IC values decline more gently along with the formation of misfit dislocations. The characteristic K_IC vs. bilayer-period-dependence nicely matches experimental trends. Importantly, all critical stress intensity values of the superlattice films clearly exceed the intrinsic fracture toughness of the constituting layer materials, evincing the importance of coherency stresses for increasing the crack growth resistance.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.