Paper detail

Enhanced AGN Activity in Overdense Galactic Environments at $2 < z < 4$

We conduct a study on the relationship between galaxy environments and their active galactic nuclei (AGN) activity at high redshifts ($2.0<z<4.0$). Specifically, we study the AGN fraction in galaxies residing in a range of environments at these redshifts, from field galaxies to highly overdense peaks in the GOODS-S extragalactic field. Utilizing the extensive photometric and spectroscopic observations in this field, we measure local- and global-overdensities over a large a range of environments, including in several massive (M$_{tot}\geq10^{14.8}$M$_\odot$) protostructures. We employ a multi-wavelength AGN catalog consisting of AGN in nine different categories. Our analysis shows a higher AGN fraction (10.9$^{+3.6}_{-2.3}$%) for galaxies in the highest local-overdensity regions compared to the AGN fraction (1.9$^{+0.4}_{-0.3}$%) of coeval field galaxies (a ~4$σ$ difference). This trend of increasing AGN fraction in denser environments relative to the field is present in all redshift bins. We also find this trend consistently present in all five AGN categories that have a sufficient number of AGN to make a meaningful comparison: mid-IR SED, mid-IR color, X-ray luminosity, X-ray-luminosity-to-radio-luminosity-ratio, and optical-spectroscopy. Our results also demonstrate a clear trend of higher (~4x) AGN fractions in denser environments for a given stellar mass. Additionally, we observe the same trend (though at a lower significance) with the global environment of galaxies, measured using a metric based on the projected distance of galaxies from their nearest massive ($M_{tot}>10^{12.8}M_\odot$) overdense ($σ_δ>5.0$) peak, normalized with respect to the size of the peak. These findings indicate that the prevalence of AGN activity is highly dependent on the environment in which a host galaxy resides, even at early times in the formation history of the Universe.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.