Paper detail

EngMeta -- Metadata for Computational Engineering

Computational engineering generates knowledge through the analysis and interpretation of research data, which is produced by computer simulation. Supercomputers produce huge amounts of research data. To address a research question, a lot of simulations are run over a large parameter space. Therefore, handling this data and keeping an overview becomes a challenge. Data documentation is mostly handled by file and folder names in inflexible file systems, making it almost impossible for data to be findable, accessible, interopable and hence reusable. To enable and improve a structured documentation of research data from computational engineering, we developed EngMeta as a metadata model. We built this model by incorporating existing standards for general descriptive and technical information and adding metadata fields for disciplinespecific information like the components and parameters of the simulated target system and information about the research process like the used methods, software and computational environment. EngMeta functions, in practical use, as the descriptive core for an institutional repository. In order to reduce the burden of description on scientists, we have developed an approach for automatically extracting metadata information from the output and log files of computer simulations. Through a qualitative analysis, we show that EngMeta fulfills the criteria of a good metadata model. Through a quantitative survey, we can show that it meets the needs of engineering scientists.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.