Paper detail

Enforcing Annual Emission Constraints in Short-Term Operation of Local Energy Systems

This paper presents new methods for ensuring that the energy system of a neighborhood that is designed with the objective of being zero emission is actually operated in a way that allows it to reach net zero emissions in its lifetime. This paper highlights the necessity of taking into account realistic operation strategies when designing the energy system of such neighborhoods. It also suggests methods that can be used in the operation of ZENs to ensure carbon neutrality. An optimization model for designing the energy system of a Zero Emission Neighborhood (ZEN) is first presented and used to produce two designs for a campus in the South of Norway in the case where the amount of PV is limited (PVlim) and when it is not (Base). Several operation approaches are then introduced to compare their operation cost and the CO2 emissions and compensations. These approaches are perfect foresight used as a reference (Ref.),a purely economic model predictive control (E-MPC), an MPC with penalization if deviating from emission targets (EmE-MPC)and a receding horizon MPC where we have a net zero emission constraint over the year (RH-MPC). The resulting energy systems are, in the Base case, PV, heat pumps, a gas boiler and heat storage and, in the PVlim case, a smaller amount of PV, a CHP plant, and heat storage. In the Base case all operation strategies manage to reach net zero emissions, largely due to the passive compensations obtained from the PV. RH-MPC offers the lowest cost. In the PVlim case, the passive effect of the PV is not sufficient to reach net zero emissions and an operation approach specifically taking into account the emissions is necessary. EmE-MPC achieves the lowest emissions but it comes at a much higher cost. We conclude that the best overall strategy is RH-MPC which maintains both the cost and the emission-compensation balance close to the reference case with perfect foresight.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.