Paper detail

Energy-Sensitive Trajectory Design and Restoration Areas Allocation for UAV-Enabled Grassland Restoration

Grassland restoration is a critical means to safeguard grassland ecological degradation. To alleviate the extensive human labors and boost the restoration efficiency, UAV is promising for its fully automatic capability yet still waits to be exploited. This paper progresses this emerging technology by explicitly considering the realistic constraints of the UAV and the grassland degradation while planning the grassland restoration. To this end, the UAV-enabled restoration process is first mathematically modeled as the maximization of restoration areas of the UAV under the limited battery energy of UAV, the grass seeds weight, the number of restored areas, and the corresponding sizes. Then we analyze that, by considering these constraints, this original problem emerges two conflict objectives, namely the shortest flight path and the optimal areas allocation. As a result, the maximization of restoration areas turns out to be a composite of a trajectory design problem and an areas allocation problem that are highly coupled. From the perspective of optimization, this requires solving two NP-hard problems of both the traveling salesman problem (TSP) and the multidimensional knapsack problem (MKP) at the same time. To tackle this complex problem, we propose a cooperative optimization algorithm, called CHAPBILM, to solve those two problems interlacedly by utilizing the interdependencies between them. Multiple simulations verify the conflicts between the trajectory design and areas allocation. The effectiveness of the cooperative optimization algorithm is also supported by the comparisons with traditional optimization methods which do not utilize the interdependencies between the two problems. As a result, the proposed algorithm successfully solves the multiple simulation instances in a near-optimal way.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.