Paper detail

Energy scales and black hole pseudospectra: the structural role of the scalar product

A pseudospectrum analysis has recently provided evidence of a potential generic instability of black hole (BH) quasinormal mode (QNM) overtones under high-frequency perturbations. Such instability analysis depends on the assessment of the size of perturbations. This is encoded in the scalar product and its choice is not unique. We address the impact of the scalar product choice, founding it on the physical energy scales of the problem. The article is organized in three parts: basics, applications and heuristic proposals. In the first part, we revisit the energy scalar product used in the hyperboloidal approach to QNMs, extending previous effective analyses and placing them on solid spacetime basis. The second part focuses on applications of the scalar product in the QNM problem: i) we demonstrate that the QNM instability is not an artifact of previous spectral numerical schemes, by implementing a finite elements calculation from a weak formulation; ii) using Keldysh's theorem, we provide QNM resonant expansions for the gravitational waveform, with explicit expressions of the expansion coefficients; iii) we propose the notion of "epsilon-dual QNM expansions" to exploit BH QNM instability in BH spectroscopy, exploiting both non-perturbed and perturbed QNMs, the former informing on large scales and the latter probing small scales. The third part enlarges the conceptual scope of BH QNM instability proposing: a) spiked perturbations are more efficient in triggering BH QNM instabilities than smooth ones, b) a general picture of the BH QNM instability problem is given, supporting the conjecture (built on Burnett's conjecture) that Nollert-Price branches converge universally to logarithmic Regge branches in the high-frequency limit and c) aiming at a fully geometric description of QNMs, BMS states are hinted as possible asymptotic/boundary degrees of freedom for an inverse scattering problem.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.