Paper detail

Energy per base pair model from NN parameters and its applications in genomic research

Nearest-neighbor(NN) free energy parameters for DNA are well studied and reliable values of these parameters exist in the literature. They have been found to be very useful in studying DNA melting and DNA stabilization studies. In this paper, using these parameters, we have constructed a model in which one can define the energy of a base pair between any two neighboring base pairs. This model allows us to use the Boltzmann weighting factor to perform Monte Carlo sampling to probe the average energy per base pair in random sequences that must have existed at the very beginning before life existed. We then employed our model to the publicly available human Genome data. We calculated the average energy per base pair in inter-gene regions where there is no overlap of genes and also for exons and introns separately. We found that (1) these 'ancient' random sequences still persist in human genome although very scarce (2) the average energy per base pair has drifted about $22.5 \%$ of the ancient value. (3) Our model together with known mutation rates provide us with a new way to look at the 'age of life'.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.