Paper detail

Energy levels and radiative rates for transitions in S-like Sc~VI, V VIII, Cr IX, and Mn~X

Energy levels, radiative rates and lifetimes are reported for four S-like ions, namely Sc~VI, V VIII, Cr IX, and Mn~X. Two independent atomic structure codes, namely the general-purpose relativistic atomic structure package ({\sc grasp}) and the flexible atomic code ({\sc fac}), have been adopted for calculating the energy levels, with differing amounts of configuration interaction. This is mainly to make some assessment of accuracy. However, the {\sc grasp} alone is used for calculating the remaining parameters. Results are reported for varying number of levels of these ions, and for calculating lifetimes contributions are included from all types of transitions, i.e. E1, E2, M1, and M2. Comparisons are made with the earlier available experimental and theoretical results and assessments of accuracy are given for each ion. Additionally, the presently reported data cover a significantly larger number of levels and transitions than already available in the literature for the four S-like ions.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.