Paper detail

Energy-Grade Double Pricing Rule in the Heating Market

The problem of heat system pricing is considered. A direct extension of locational marginal prices (LMP) in electricity markets to heat systems may lead to revenue inadequate issues. The underlying reason for such a problem is that, unlike electric power, heat has different grades and cannot be considered as homogenized commodity. Accordingly, an energy-grade double pricing rule is proposed in this paper. Heat energy and grade prices are explained as the shadow prices related to the nodal heat balance constraints and temperature requirements constraints at the optimal solution. The resulting merchandise surplus at each dispatch interval can be decomposed into several explainable parts, namely, congestion rent, impact from the last period, and impact from the upcoming period. And the total merchandise surplus over all dispatch intervals can be decomposed into several non-negative interpretable parts, including congestion rent and impact from the initial state, thus guaranteeing the revenue adequacy for the heat system operator. Simulations verify the effectiveness of the proposed mechanism.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.