Paper detail

Energy estimates and cavity interaction for a critical-exponent cavitation model

We consider the minimization of $\int_{Ω_{\ep}} |D\vec u|^p \dd\vec x$ in a perforated domain $Ω_{\ep}:= Ω\setminus \bigcup_{i=1}^M B_{\ep}(\vec a_i)$ of $\R^n$, among maps $\vec u \in W^{1,p}(Ω_{\ep}, \R^n)$ that are incompressible ($\det D\vec u\equiv 1$), invertible, and satisfy a Dirichlet boundary condition $\vec u= \vec g$ on $\partial Ω$. If the volume enclosed by $\vec g (\partial Ω)$ is greater than $|Ω|$, any such deformation $\vec u$ is forced to map the small holes $B_{\ep}(\vec a_i)$ onto macroscopically visible cavities (which do not disappear as $\ep\to 0$). We restrict our attention to the critical exponent $p=n$, where the energy required for cavitation is of the order of $\sum_{i=1}^M v_i |\log \ep|$ and the model is suited, therefore, for an asymptotic analysis ($v_1,..., v_M$ denote the volumes of the cavities). In the spirit of the analysis of vortices in Ginzburg-Landau theory, we obtain estimates for the "renormalized" energy $\frac{1}{n}\int_{Ω_{\ep}} |\frac{D\vec u}{\sqrt{n-1}}|^p \dd\vec x - \sum_i v_i |\log \ep|$, showing its dependence on the size and the shape of the cavities, on the initial distance between the cavitation points $\vec a_1,..., \vec a_M$, and on the distance from these points to the outer boundary $\partial Ω$. Based on those estimates we conclude, for the case of two cavities, that either the cavities prefer to be spherical in shape and well separated, or to be very close to each other and appear as a single equivalent round cavity. This is in agreement with existing numerical simulations, and is reminiscent of the interaction between cavities in the mechanism of ductile fracture by void growth and coalescence.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.