Paper detail

Energy deposition studies in the LHCb insertion region from the validation to a step into the Hilumi challenge

The LHCb (Large Hadron Collider beauty) experiment at CERN aims at achieving a significantly higher luminosity than originally planned by means of two major upgrades: the Upgrade I that took place during the Long Shutdown 2 (LS2) and the Upgrade II foreseen for LS4. Such an increase in instantaneous and integrated luminosity with respect to the design values requires to reassess the radiation exposure of LHC magnets, cryogenics and electronic equipment placed in the Insertion Region 8 (IR8) around LHCb. Monte Carlo simulations are a powerful tool to understand and predict the interaction between particle showers and accelerator elements, especially in case of future scenarios. For this purpose, their validation through the comparison with available measurements is a relevant step. A detailed IR8 model, including the LHCb detector, has been implemented with the FLUKA code. The objective of this study is to evaluate radiation levels due to proton-proton collisions and benchmark the predicted dose values against Beam Loss Monitor (BLM) measurements performed in 2018. Finally, we comment on the upcoming LHC run (Run 3), featuring a first luminosity jump in LHCb.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.