Paper detail

Energy dependence of the dijet imbalance in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 ATeV

The appearance of monojets is among the most striking signature of jet quenching in the context of ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions at the Large Hadron Collider. Experimentally, the asymmetry of back-to-back jets is quantified in terms of the dijet imbalance distribution by the ATLAS and CMS collaborations. Recently, the CMS collaboration has also studied the trigger jet momentum (P_T) dependence of the imbalance in the range between 120 and 500 GeV which is found to decrease with jet P_T. In this work, results from the in-medium shower code YaJEM are compared with this data set. These results suggest that the main effects observed in the data are the kinematical collimation of jets and the increase in the probability to produce more collimated quark jets with jet P_T, whereas there is no indication for any non-trivial energy dependence of the shower-medium interaction mechanism itself. The data furthermore can rule out models in which the jet shape is collimated due to the medium modification.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.