Paper detail

Energy budget of forming clumps in numerical simulations of collapsing clouds

We analyze the physical properties and energy balance of density enhancements in two SPH simulations of the formation, evolution, and collapse of giant molecular clouds. In the simulations, no feedback is included, so all motions are due either to the initial, decaying turbulence, or to gravitational contraction. We define clumps as connected regions above a series of density thresholds. The resultingfull set of clumps follows the generalized energy-equipartition relation $σ_{v}/R^{1/2} \propto Σ^{1/2}$, where $σ_{v}$ is the velocity dispersion, $R$ is the "radius", and $Σ$ is the column density. We interpret this as a natural consequence of gravitational contraction at all scales, rather than virial equilibrium. Nevertheless, clumps with low $Σ$ tend to show a large scatter around equipartition. In more than half of the cases, this scatter is dominated by external turbulent compressions that {\it assemble} the clumps, rather than by small-scale random motions that would disperse them. The other half does actually disperse. Moreover, clump sub-samples selected by means of different criteria exhibit different scalings. Sub-samples with narrow $Σ$ ranges follow Larson-like relations, although characterized by their respective value of $Σ$. Finally, we find that: i) clumps lying in filaments tend to appear sub-virial; ii) high-density cores ($n \ge 10^5$ cm$^3$) that exhibit moderate kinetic energy excesses often contain sink ("stellar") particles, and the excess disappears when the stellar mass is taken into account in the energy balance; iii) cores with kinetic energy excess but no stellar particles are truly in a state of dispersal.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.