Paper detail

Energy and angular momentum balance in wall-bounded superfluid turbulence

A superfluid in the absence of the viscous normal component should be the best realization of an ideal inviscid Euler fluid. As expressed by d'Alembert's famous paradox, an ideal fluid does not exert drag on bodies past which it flows, or in other words, it does not exchange momentum with them. Also, the flow of an ideal fluid does not dissipate kinetic energy. We study experimentally whether these properties apply to the flow of superfluid 3He-B in a rotating cylinder at low temperatures. It is found that ideal behavior is broken by quantum turbulence, which leads to substantial energy dissipation, as observed also earlier. Here we show that remarkably, nearly ideal behavior is preserved with respect to the angular-momentum exchange between the superfluid and its container, i.e., the drag almost disappears in the zero-temperature limit. This mismatch between energy and angular-momentum transfer results in a new physical situation where the proper description of wall-bounded quantum turbulence requires two effective friction parameters, one for energy dissipation and another for momentum coupling, which become substantially different at very low temperatures.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.