Paper detail

Energetics and mixing efficiency of lock-exchange gravity currents using simultaneous velocity and density fields

A series of laboratory experiments on energy conserving gravity currents in a lock-exchange facility are conducted for a range of Reynolds numbers, $Re= \frac{U_Fh}ν =$ 485-12270. The velocity and density fields are captured simultaneously using a PIV-PLIF system. A moving average method is employed to compute the mean field and a host of turbulence statistics, namely, turbulent kinetic energy ($K$), shear production ($P$), buoyancy flux ($B$), and energy dissipation ($ε$) during the slumping phase of the current. The subsequent findings are used to ascertain the quantitative values of mixing efficiency, $Ri_{f}$, Ozmidov length-scale ($L_O$), Kolmogorov length-scale ($L_κ$), and eddy diffusivities of momentum ($κ_m$) and scalar ($κ_ρ$). Two different forms of $Ri_{f}$ are characterized in this study, denoted by $Ri_{f}^I=\frac{B}{P}$ and $Ri_{f}^{II}=\frac{B}{B+ε}$. The results cover the entire diffusive regime (3 $<Re_b<$ 10) and a portion of the intermediate regime (10 $<Re_b<$ 50), where $Re_b=\fracε{νN^2}$ is the buoyancy Reynolds number that measures the level of turbulence in a shear-stratified flow. The values of $P$, $B$, and $ε$ show a marked increase at the interface of the ambient fluid and the current, owing to the development of a shear-driven mixed layer. Based on the changes in the turbulence statistics and the length scales, it is inferred that the turbulence decays along the length of the current. The mixing efficiency monotonically increases in the diffusive regime ($Re_{b}<$10), and is found to have an upper bound of $Ri_{f}^{I}\approx$ 0.15 and $Ri_{f}^{II}\approx$ 0.2 in the intermediate regime. Using the values of $Ri_{f}$, the normalized eddy diffusivity of momentum is parameterized as $\frac{κ_m}{ν.Ri_{g}}$=1.2$Re_{b}$ and normalized eddy diffusivity of scalar as $\frac{κ_ρ}ν$=0.2$Re_{b}$

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.