Paper detail

Enabling Cognitive Intelligence Queries in Relational Databases using Low-dimensional Word Embeddings

We apply distributed language embedding methods from Natural Language Processing to assign a vector to each database entity associated token (for example, a token may be a word occurring in a table row, or the name of a column). These vectors, of typical dimension 200, capture the meaning of tokens based on the contexts in which the tokens appear together. To form vectors, we apply a learning method to a token sequence derived from the database. We describe various techniques for extracting token sequences from a database. The techniques differ in complexity, in the token sequences they output and in the database information used (e.g., foreign keys). The vectors can be used to algebraically quantify semantic relationships between the tokens such as similarities and analogies. Vectors enable a dual view of the data: relational and (meaningful rather than purely syntactical) text. We introduce and explore a new class of queries called cognitive intelligence (CI) queries that extract information from the database based, in part, on the relationships encoded by vectors. We have implemented a prototype system on top of Spark to exhibit the power of CI queries. Here, CI queries are realized via SQL UDFs. This power goes far beyond text extensions to relational systems due to the information encoded in vectors. We also consider various extensions to the basic scheme, including using a collection of views derived from the database to focus on a domain of interest, utilizing vectors and/or text from external sources, maintaining vectors as the database evolves and exploring a database without utilizing its schema. For the latter, we consider minimal extensions to SQL to vastly improve query expressiveness.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.