Paper detail

Empirical optical k-Corrections for redshifts <= 0.7

The Smithsonian Hectospec Lensing Survey (SHELS) is a magnitude limited spectroscopically complete survey for R<=21.0 covering 4 square degrees. SHELS provides a large sample (15,513) of flux calibrated spectra. The wavelength range covered by the spectra allows empirical determination of k-corrections for the g- and r-band from z=0 to ~0.68 and 0.33, respectively, based on large samples of spectra. We approximate the k-corrections using only two parameters in a standard way: Dn4000 and redshift. We use Dn4000 rather than the standard observed galaxy color because Dn4000 is a redshift independent tracer of the stellar population of the galaxy. Our approximations for the k-corrections using Dn4000 are as good as (or better than) those based on observed galaxy color (g-r) (sigma of the scatter is ~0.08 mag). The approximations for the k-corrections are available in an on-line calculator. Our results agree with previously determined analytical approximations from single stellar population (SSP) models fitted to multi-band optical and near-infrared photometry for galaxies with a known redshift. Galaxies with the smallest Dn4000-the galaxies with the youngest stellar populations-are always attenuated and/or contain contributions from older stellar populations. We use simple single SSP fits to the SHELS spectra to study the influence of emission lines on the k-correction. The effects of emission lines can be ignored for rest-frame equivalent widths <~ 100 A depending on required photometric accuracy. We also provide analytic approximations to the k-corrections determined from our model fits for z<=0.7 as a function of redshift and Dn4000 for ugriz and UBVRI (sigma of the scatter is typically ~0.10 mag). Again, the approximations using Dn4000 are as good (or better than) those based on a suitably chosen observed galaxy color. We provide all analytical approximations in an on-line calculator.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.