Paper detail

Empirical Investigation on the Impact of Hydrogen Collisions for the Formation of CI 1.07 mu~m Lines Based on the Solar Center-to-Limb Variation

With an aim of examining the validity of non-LTE line-formation calculations for the strong C I lines of multiplet 1 at 1.068-1.069 mu~m, especially in terms of the treatment of collisions with neutral hydrogen (H I) atoms, we computed theoretical equivalent widths (W_lambda) of these lines corresponding to specific intensities of different angles (mu = cos(theta)) on the solar disk under various conditions, which were then compared with the empirical W_lambda vs. mu relations obtained from our spectroscopic observations using the Domeless Solar Telescope at Hida Observatory. It turned out that our observational data are almost consistent with the theoretical simulations done with the H I collision rates computed with the classical formula, which suggests that the necessity of its significant revision (e.g., considerable reduction) is unlikely.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.