Paper detail

Empirical determination of the integrated red giant and horizontal branch stellar mass loss in omega Centauri

We herein determine the average integrated mass loss from stars stars belonging to the dominant metal-poor population ([Fe/H] ~ --1.7) of the Galactic globular cluster omega Centauri (NGC 5139) during their red giant and horizontal branch evolution. Masses are empirically calculated from spectroscopic measurements of surface gravity and photometric measurements of temperature and luminosity. Systematic uncertainties prevent an absolute measurement of masses at a phase of evolution. However, the relative masses of early asymptotic giant branch stars and central red giant branch stars can be measured, and used to derive the mass loss between these two phases. This can then be used as a physical check of models of horizontal branch (HB) stars. For omega Cen, the average difference is found to be 26 +/- 4%. Assuming initial and final masses of 0.83 and 0.53 solar masses, we determine that 0.21 +/- 0.03 solar masses is lost on the RGB and 0.09 +/- ~0.05 solar masses is lost on the AGB. The implied HB stellar mass of 0.62 +/- 0.04 solar masses is commensurate with literature determinations of the masses of the cluster's HB stars. The accuracy of this measurement can be improved through better selection of stars and spectral coverage, and applied to other clusters where horizontal branch models do not currently agree.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.