Paper detail

Empirical Constraints of Super-Galactic Winds at z >= 0.5

(Abridged) Under the hypothesis that MgII absorbers found near the minor axis of a galaxy originate in the cool phase of winds, we carry out a study to constrain the properties of large-scale outflows at redshift z >= 0.5 based on the observed relative motions of individual absorbing clouds with respect to the positions and orientations of the galaxies. We identify in the literature four highly inclined disk galaxies located within 50 kpc and with the minor axis oriented within 45 degrees of a background QSO sightline. Deep HST images of the galaxies are available for accurate morphologies of the galaxies. Echelle spectra of the QSO members are also available in public archives for resolving the velocity field of individual absorption clumps. Three galaxies in our sample are located at rho=8-34 kpc and exhibit strong associated MgII absorption feature with Wr(2796) >= 0.8 Å. One galaxy, located at an impact parameters rho=48 kpc, does not show an associated MgII absorber to a 3-sigma limit of Wr(2796)=0.01Å. Combining known inclination and orientation angles of the star-forming disks, and resolved absorption profiles of the associated absorbers at rho < 35 kpc, we explore the parameter space for the opening angle theta_0 and the velocity field of large-scale galactic outflows as a function of z-height, v(z). We find that the absorption profiles of the MgII doublets and FeII series are compatible with the gas being either accelerated or decelerated, depending on theta_0, though accelerated outflows are valid only for a narrow range of theta_0. Under an acceleration scenario, we compare the derived $v(z)$ with predictions from Murray et al. (2011) and find that if the gas is being accelerateted by the radiation and ram pressure forces from super star clusters, then the efficiency of thermal energy input from a supernova explosion is epsilon <= 0.01.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.