Paper detail

Empirical completeness assessment of the Gaia DR2, Pan-STARRS 1 and ASAS-SN-II RR Lyrae catalogues

RR Lyrae stars are an important and widely used tracer of the most ancient populations of our Galaxy, mainly due to their standard candle nature. The availability of large scale surveys of variable stars is allowing us to trace the structure of our entire Galaxy, even in previously inaccessible areas like the Galactic disc. In this work we aim to provide an empirical assessment of the completeness of the three largest RR Lyrae catalogues available: Gaia DR2, PanSTARRS-1 and ASAS-SN-II. Using a joint probabilistic analysis of the three surveys we compute 2D and 3D completeness maps in each survey's full magnitude range. At the bright end (G<13) we find ASAS-SN-II and Gaia are near 100% complete in RRab at high latitude (|b|>20deg); ASAS-SN-II has the best completeness at low latitude for RRab and at all latitudes for RRc. At the faint end (G>13), Gaia DR2 is the most complete catalogue for both RR Lyrae types, at any latitude, with median completeness rates of 95% (RRab) and >85% (RRc) outside the ecliptic plane (|β|>25deg). We confirm a high and uniform completeness of PanSTARRS-1 RR Lyrae at 91% (RRab) and 82% (RRc) down to G~18, and provide the first estimate of its completeness at low galactic latitude (|b|<20deg) at an estimated median 65% (RRab) and 50-60% (RRc). Our results are publicly available as 2D and 3D completeness maps, and as functions to evaluate each survey's completeness versus distance or per line-of sight.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.