Paper detail

Empirical Bayes unfolding of elementary particle spectra at the Large Hadron Collider

We consider the so-called unfolding problem in experimental high energy physics, where the goal is to estimate the true spectrum of elementary particles given observations distorted by measurement error due to the limited resolution of a particle detector. This an important statistical inverse problem arising in the analysis of data at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. Mathematically, the problem is formalized as one of estimating the intensity function of an indirectly observed Poisson point process. Particle physicists are particularly keen on unfolding methods that feature a principled way of choosing the regularization strength and allow for the quantification of the uncertainty inherent in the solution. Though there are many approaches that have been considered by experimental physicists, it can be argued that few -- if any -- of these deal with these two key issues in a satisfactory manner. In this paper, we propose to attack the unfolding problem within the framework of empirical Bayes estimation: we consider Bayes estimators of the coefficients of a basis expansion of the unknown intensity, using a regularizing prior; and employ a Monte Carlo expectation-maximization algorithm to find the marginal maximum likelihood estimate of the hyperparameter controlling the strength of the regularization. Due to the data-driven choice of the hyperparameter, credible intervals derived using the empirical Bayes posterior lose their subjective Bayesian interpretation. Since the properties and meaning of such intervals are poorly understood, we explore instead the use of bootstrap resampling for constructing purely frequentist confidence bands for the true intensity. The performance of the proposed methodology is demonstrated using both simulations and real data from the Large Hadron Collider.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.