Paper detail

Emission-lines calibrations of the Star Formation Rate from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Our goal is to study the existing star formation rate calibrations based on emission-line luminosities and to provide new ones. We use the SDSS data release DR4, which gives star formation rates and emission-line luminosities of more than 100000 star-forming galaxies. We confirm that the best results are obtained with the Halpha calibration. This calibration has an uncertainty of 0.17 dex. We show that one has to check carefully the method used to derive the dust attenuation and to use the adequate calibration: in some cases, the standard scaling law has to be replaced by a more general power law. When data is corrected for dust attenuation but the Halpha emission line not observed, the use of the Hbeta emission line, has to be preferred to the [OII]3727 emission line. In the case of uncorrected data, the correction for dust attenuation can be assumed as a constant value but we show that such method leads to poor results, in terms of dispersion and residual slope. Self-consistent corrections, based e.g. on the absolute magnitude, give better results in terms of dispersion but still suffer from systematic shifts, and/or residual slopes. The best results with data not corrected for dust attenuation are obtained when using the observed [OII]3727 and Hbeta emission lines together. This calibration has an uncertainty of 0.23 dex.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.