Paper detail

Emission line widths and QSO black hole mass estimates from the 2dF QSO Redshift Survey

We have used composite spectra generated from more than 22000 QSOs observed in the course of the 2dF and 6dF QSO Redshift Surveys to investigate the relationship between the velocity width of emission lines and QSO luminosity. We find that the velocity width of the broad emission lines Hbeta, Hgamma, MgII, CIII] and CIV are correlated with the continuum luminosity, with a significance of more than 99 per cent. Of the major narrow emission lines ([OIII] 5007, [OII] 3727, NeIII 3870 and NeV 3426) only [OIII] exhibits a significant correlation between line width and luminosity. Assuming that the gas is moving in Keplerian orbits and that the radius of the broad line region is related to the QSO continuum luminosity, we use the velocity widths of the broad lines to derive average black hole masses for the QSOs contributing to the composite spectra. The resultant QSO mass-luminosity relationship is consistent with M ~ L^0.97+-0.16. We find that the correlation between line width and redshift, if present, must be weak, and only CIV shows significant evidence of evolution. This enables us to constrain the redshift evolution of the black hole mass-luminosity ratio to be ~(1+z)^beta with beta ~< 1, much less than the ~(1+z)^3 evolution seen in QSO luminosity evolution. Assuming that the motion of the broad line region gas is Keplerian and that its radius depends on the QSO luminosity, our models indicate that the observed weak redshift dependence is too small for the observed QSO luminosity function to be due to the evolution of a single long-lived population of sources.

preprint2003arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.