Paper detail

Emission from Hot Dust in the Infrared Spectra of Gamma-ray Bright Blazars

A possible source of $γ$-ray photons observed from the jets of blazars is inverse Compton scattering by relativistic electrons of infrared seed photons from a hot, dusty torus in the nucleus. We use observations from the Spitzer Space Telescope to search for signatures of such dust in the infrared spectra of four $γ$-ray bright blazars, the quasars 4C 21.35, CTA102, and PKS 1510$-$089, and the BL Lacertae object ON231. The spectral energy distribution (SED) of 4C 21.35 contains a prominent infrared excess indicative of dust emission. After subtracting a non-thermal component with a power-law spectrum, we fit a dust model to the residual SED. The model consists of a blackbody with temperature $\sim1200$ K, plus a much weaker optically thin component at $\sim660$ K. The total luminosity of the thermal dust emission is $7.9\pm0.2 \times 10^{45}$ erg s$^{-1}$. If the dust lies in an equatorial torus, the density of IR photons from the torus is sufficient to explain the $γ$-ray flux from 4C 21.35 as long as the scattering occurs within a few parsecs of the central engine. We also report a tentative detection of dust in the quasar CTA102, in which the luminosity of the infrared excess is $7 \pm 2 \times 10^{45}$ erg s$^{-1}$. However, in CTA102 the far-IR spectra are too noisy to detect the $10 μ$m silicate feature. Upper limits to the luminosity from thermal emission from dust in PKS 1510-089, and ON231, are, $2.3\times10^{45}$, and $6.6\times10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$, respectively. These upper limits do not rule out the possibility of inverse Compton up-scattering of IR photons to $γ$-ray energies in these two sources. The estimated covering factor of the hot dust in 4C 21.35, 22%, is similar to that of non-blazar quasars; however, 4C 21.35 is deficient in cooler dust.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.