Paper detail

Emerging ordinary superhumps as the standard candle for WZ Sge stars

In Kato (2015, arXiv:1507.07659), I suggested that the magnitude when ordinary superhumps appear can be a standard candle for WZ Sge stars. Using Gaia EDR3 parallaxes, I studied 53 WZ Sge stars to examine this suggestion. The analysis indicated that the absolute magnitudes when ordinary superhumps appear are strongly dependent on orbital inclinations, which is consistent with what is expected for the projected area for optical thick accretion disks. I showed that there is a linear relation between these absolute magnitudes and logarithmic amplitudes of early superhumps, which are also dependent on the inclinations. I confirmed that the magnitude when ordinary superhumps appear can be used as the standard candle for WZ Sge stars particularly when the amplitude of early superhumps is observationally known. The resultant median absolute magnitude when ordinary superhumps appear was $+$5.4 (for an average inclination of 1 radian). A few objects with multiple rebrightenings, which are good candidates for period bouncers, showed slightly fainter absolute magnitudes, although the majority of the same class of objects follows the relation. Using the relation, I derived an empirical relation between the inclination and the amplitude of early superhumps. I applied the relation to MASTER OT J030227.28$+$191754.5, which was initially considered as a possible optical counterpart of the high-energy neutrino event IceCube-211125A, and concluded that this WZ Sge star was one of the faintest before the outburst and one of the brightest around the optical peak in terms of absolute magnitudes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.