Paper detail

Emergence of local geometric laws of step flow in homoepitaxial growth

Below the roughening transition, crystal surfaces exhibit nanoscale line defects, steps, that move by exchanging atoms with their environment. In homoepitaxy, we analytically show how the motion of a step train in vacuum under strong desorption can be approximately described by nonlinear laws that depend on local geometric features such as the curvature of each step, as well as suitably defined effective terrace widths. We assume that each step edge, a free boundary, can be represented by a smooth curve in a fixed reference plane for sufficiently long times. Besides surface diffusion and evaporation, the processes under consideration include kinetic step-step interactions in slowly varying geometries, material deposition on the surface from above, attachment and detachment of atoms at steps, step edge diffusion, and step permeability. Our methodology relies on boundary integral equations for the adatom fluxes responsible for step flow. By applying asymptotics, which effectively treat the diffusive term of the free boundary problem as a singular perturbation, we describe an intimate connection of universal character between step kinetics and local geometry.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.