Paper detail

Embracing ambivalence in studying technology acceptance: A qualitative study on automated visual software for live music performance

Although the live music entertainment sector does not directly fuel the current debate on automation, it might harbor positions that resonate with it. In this paper we study a prototype software application helping DJs and VJs to accurately manage and even automate the synchronization of visuals with music during amateur or professional live performance. The goal of the study was to unravel VJs' and DJs' ambivalent positions about this software. We preliminarily investigated VJs' and DJs' perception of their sector of activity with seven face-to-face interviews and an online survey (N = 102); then, we asked DJs and VJs (N = 25) for their opinions about our prototype software application. Four core controversies were identified in their answers, along with a set of arguments mobilized to take side on them. The advantages of focusing on ambivalence and argumentation when studying users' response to new media are discussed.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.