Paper detail

Embedding of biological distribution networks with differing environmental constraints

Distribution networks -- from vasculature to urban transportation systems -- are prevalent in both the natural and consumer worlds. These systems are intrinsically physical in composition and are embedded into real space, properties that lead to constraints on their topological organization. In this study, we compare and contrast two types of biological distribution networks: mycelial fungi and the vasculature system on the surface of rodent brains. Both systems are alike in that they must route resources efficiently, but they are also inherently distinct in terms of their growth mechanisms, and in that fungi are not attached to a larger organism and must often function in unregulated and varied environments. We begin by uncovering a common organizational principle -- Rentian scaling -- that manifests as hierarchical network layout in both physical and topological space. Simulated models of distribution networks optimized for transport in the presence of fluctuations are also shown to exhibit this feature in their embedding, with similar scaling exponents. However, we also find clear differences in how the fungi and vasculature balance tradeoffs in material cost, efficiency, and robustness. While the vasculature appear well optimized for low cost, but relatively high efficiency, the fungi tend to form more expensive but in turn more robust networks. These differences may be driven by the distinct functions that each system must perform, and the different habitats in which they reside. As a whole, this work demonstrates that distribution networks contain a set of common, emergent design features, as well as tailored optimizations.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.