Paper detail

Embedding by Normalisation

This paper presents the insight that practical embedding techniques, commonly used for implementing Domain-Specific Languages, correspond to theoretical Normalisation-By-Evaluation (NBE) techniques, commonly used for deriving canonical form of terms with respect to an equational theory. NBE constitutes of four components: a syntactic domain, a semantic domain, and a pair of translations between the two. Embedding also often constitutes of four components: an object language, a host language, encoding of object terms in the host, and extraction of object code from the host. The correspondence is deep in that all four components in embedding and NBE correspond to each other. Based on this correspondence, this paper introduces Embedding-By-Normalisation (EBN) as a principled approach to study and structure embedding. The correspondence is useful in that solutions from NBE can be borrowed to solve problems in embedding. In particular, based on NBE techniques, such as Type-Directed Partial Evaluation, this paper presents a solution to the problem of extracting object code from embedded programs involving sum types, such as conditional expressions, and primitives, such as literals and operations on them.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.