Paper detail

Elucidating atmospheric brown carbon -- Supplanting chemical intuition with exhaustive enumeration and machine learning

To unravel the structures of C12H12O7 isomers, identified as light-absorbing photooxidation products of syringol in atmospheric chamber experiments, we apply a graph-based molecule generator and machine learning workflow. To accomplish this in a bias-free manner, molecular graphs of the entire chemical subspace of C12H12O7 were generated, assuming that the isomers contain two C6-rings; this led to 260 million molecular graphs and 120 million stable structures. Using quantum chemistry excitation energies and oscillator strengths as training data, we predicted these quantities using kernel ridge regression and simulated UV/Vis absorption spectra. Then we determined the probability of the molecules to cause the experimental spectrum within the errors of the different methods. Molecules whose spectra were likely to match the experimental spectrum were clustered according to structural features, resulting in clusters of > 500,000 molecules. While we identified several features that correlate with a high probability to cause the experimental spectrum, no clear composition of necessary features can be given. Thus, the absorption spectrum is not sufficient to uniquely identify one specific isomer structure. If more structural features were known from experimental data, the number of structures could be reduced to a few tens of thousands candidates. We offer a procedure to detect when sufficient fragmentation data has been included to reduce the number of possible molecules. The most efficient strategy to obtain valid candidates is obtained if structural data is applied already at the bias-free molecule generation stage. The systematic enumeration, however, is necessary to avoid mis-identification of molecules, while it guarantees that there are no other molecules that would also fit the spectrum in question.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.