Paper detail

Electroweak Supersymmetry (EWSUSY) in the NMSSM

To explain all the available experimental results, we have proposed the Electroweak Supersymmetry (EWSUSY) previously, where the squarks and/or gluino are heavy around a few TeVs while the sleptons, sneutrinos, Bino, Winos, and/or Higgsinos are light within one TeV. In the Next to Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (NMSSM), we perform the systematic χ^2 analyses on parameter space scan for three EWSUSY scenarios: (I) R-parity conservation and one dark matter candidate; (II) R-parity conservation and multi-component dark matter; (III) R-parity violation. We obtain the minimal χ^2/(degree of freedom) of 10.2/15, 9.6/14, and 9.2/14 respectively for Scenarios I, II, and III. Considering the constraints from the LHC neutralino/chargino and slepton searches, we find that the majority of viable parameter space prefered by the muon anomalous magnetic moment has been excluded except for the parameter space with moderate to large \tanβ(\ge 8). Especially, the most favorable parameter space has relatively large \tanβ, moderate λ, small μ_{eff}, heavy squarks/gluino, and the second lightest CP-even neutral Higgs boson with mass around 125 GeV. In addition, if the left-handed smuon is nearly degenerate with or heavier than Wino, there is no definite bound on Wino mass. Otherwise, the Wino with mass up to \sim 450 GeV has been excluded. Furthermore, we present several benchmark points for Scenarios I and II, and briefly discuss the prospects of the EWSUSY searches at the 14 TeV LHC and ILC.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.