Paper detail

Electrostatics-based finite-size correction for first-principles point defect calculations

Finite-size corrections for charged defect supercell calculations typically consist of image-charge and potential alignment corrections. A wide variety of schemes for both corrections have been proposed for decades. Regarding the image-charge correction, Freysoldt, Neugebauer, and Van de Walle (FNV) recently proposed a novel method that enables us to accurately estimate the correction energy a posteriori through alignment of the defect-induced potential to the model charge potential [Freysoldt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 016402 (2009)]. This method, however, still has two issues in practice. Firstly, it uses planar-averaged potential for determining the potential offset, which cannot be readily applied to relaxed system. Secondly, the long-range Coulomb interaction is assumed to be screened by a macroscopic dielectric constant. This is valid only for cubic systems and can bring forth huge errors for defects in anisotropic materials. In this study, we use the atomic site electrostatic potential as a potential marker instead of the planar-averaged potential, and extend the FNV scheme by adopting the point charge model in an anisotropic medium for estimating long-range interactions. We also revisit the conventional potential alignment correction and show that it is fully included in the image-charge correction and therefore unnecessary. In addition, we show that the potential alignment corresponds to a part of first-order and full of third-order image-charge correction; thus the third-order image-charge contribution is absent after the potential alignment. Finally, a systematic assessment of the accuracy of the extended FNV correction scheme is performed for a wide range of material classes. The defect formation energies calculated using around 100-atom supercells are successfully corrected even after atomic relaxation within a few tenths of eV compared to those in the dilute limit.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.