Paper detail

Electrostatic correlations in inhomogeneous charged fluids beyond loop expansion

Electrostatic correlation effects in inhomogeneous symmetric electrolytes are investigated within a previously developed electrostatic self-consistent (SC) theory (R.R. Netz and H. Orland, Eur. Phys.J. E 11, 301 (2003)). To this aim, we introduce two computational approaches that allow to solve the SC equations beyond the loop expansion. Both approaches can handle the case of dielectrically discontinuous boundaries where the one-loop theory is known to fail. By comparing the theoretical results obtained from these schemes with the results of the MC simulations that we ran for ions at neutral single dielectric interfaces as well as with previous MC data for charged interfaces, we first show that the weak coupling (WC) Debye-Huckel (DH) theory remains quantitatively accurate up to the bulk ion density rhob=0.01 M, whereas the SC theory exhibits a good quantitative accuracy up to rhob=0.2 M. Then, we derive from the perturbative SC scheme the one-loop theory of asymmetrically partitioned salt systems around a dielectrically homogeneous charged surface. It is shown that correlation effects originate in these systems from a competition between the salt screening loss at the interface driving the ions to the bulk region, and the interfacial counterion screening excess attracting them towards the surface. In the case of weak surface charges, the interfacial salt screening loss is the dominant effect. As a result, correlations decrease the MF density of both coions and counterions. With increasing surface charge, the surface-attractive counterion screening excess starts to dominate, and correlation effects amplify in this regime the MF density of both type of ions. We also show that at a characteristic value of the electrostatic coupling parameter, electrostatic correlations result in a charge inversion effect.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.