Paper detail

Electrophysiological correlates of non-stationary BOLD functional connectivity fluctuations

Spontaneous fluctuations of the BOLD (Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent) signal, measured with fMRI (functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging), display a rich and neurobiologically relevant functional connectivity structure. This structure is usually revealed using time averaging methods, which prevent the detection of functional connectivity changes over time. In this work we studied the electrophysiological correlates of dynamical BOLD functional connectivity fluctuations, by means of long (approx. 50 min) joint electroencephalographic (EEG) and fMRI recordings. We identified widespread positive and negative correlations between EEG spectral power and fMRI BOLD connectivity fluctuations in a network of 90 cortical and subcortical regions. In particular, increased alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta (15-30 Hz) power were related to decreased functional connectivity, whereas gamma (30-60 Hz) power correlated positively with BOLD connectivity between specific brain regions. Furthermore, these patterns were altered for subjects undergoing vigilance changes, with an involvement of the slow delta (0.4 - 4 Hz) band in localized positive correlations. Finally, graph theoretical indices of network structure also exhibited sharp changes over time, with average path length correlating positively with alpha power extracted from central and frontal electrodes. Our results strongly suggest that non-stationary BOLD functional connectivity has a neurophysiological origin. Positive correlations of BOLD connectivity with gamma can be interpreted as increased average binding over relatively long periods of time, possibly due to spontaneous cognition occurring during rest. Negative correlations with alpha suggest functional inhibition of local and long-range connectivity, associated with an idling state of the brain.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.