Paper detail

Electronic structure study of TiO2 polymorphs, evaluation of formic acid adsorption on dry (001) and (100) TiO2(B) facets by DFT calculations

Structural and electronic properties comparison between anatase, rutile and monoclinic TiO2(B) titania polymorphs in bulk and related nanostructures simulated by two-dimensional slabs has been performed by means of density functional theory calculations. TiO2(B) was included due to experimental results where it appears as a metastable phase during thermal annealing of low content sodium layered titanate nanostructures obtained via hydrothermal synthesis. Band gaps and surface energies are discussed confronting results obtained by Plane Waves (PW) and Localized Basis Set methods (LCNAO), observing an excellent agreement between both methodologies when considering floating basis to calculate surfaces energies using LCAO. The computed formation energy for the TiO2(B) (001) slab, as has been previously reported by Vittadini A. et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113 (44), 18973-18977, is in the order of the one calculated for anatasa (101) which represents one of the most stable TiO2 surfaces. The adsorption of formic acid on (001) and (100) - less stable - TiO2(B) dry facets was investigated as the first step for further evaluation of TiO2(B) nanostructures for dye sensitized solar cells (DSSC) applications. The results show that the bidentate dissociated configuration is the most stable for both surfaces being the computed adsorption energy 0.76 eV and 1.35 eV for (001) and (100) respectively. These results differ from what was previously found for dry anatasa (101) where monodentate coordination prevails. The evaluated reactivity of TiO2(B) slabs is comparable with anatase and indicates that it could be a good adsorbent for common dyes used for Dye Sensitized Solar Cells purposes.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.