Paper detail

Electronic structure of superconducting Lu2Ni3Si5 and its reference compound Y2Ni3Si5 by ab initio calculations

Electronic structures of orthorhombic ternary nickel silicides: superconducting Lu2Ni3Si5 and its non-superconducting counterpart, Y2Ni3Si5, have been calculated employing the fully-relativistic and full-potential local-orbital method within the density functional theory. Our investigations were focused particularly on the band structures and Fermi surfaces (FSs), being very similar for both ternaries. It appears that their FSs exist in four bands and contain electronlike and holelike three-dimensional sheets and small pockets, which suggests a presence of two- or even multi-band superconductivity (SC) in Lu2Ni3Si5. The main difference between both systems is that only in Lu2Ni3Si5 small electron FS pockets occur around the Gamma point. It allows for arising BCS-like SC in this compound, as was deduced from previous heat-capacity measurements, while no sign of SC has been detected (at least down to 2 K) in Y2Ni3Si5. In the latter system, a possible formation of a ferromagnetic ground state, which usually tends to destroy SC, has been excluded by our calculations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.