Paper detail

Electronic structural critique of interesting thermal and optical properties of C$_{17}$Ge germagraphene

In this communication, we report a theoretical attempt to understand the involvement of electronic structure in determination of optical and thermal properties of C$_{17}$Ge germagraphene, a buckled two dimensional material. The structure is found to be a direct bandgap semiconductor with low carrier effective mass. Our study has revealed that the effect of spin-orbit coupling on the band structure and in appearance of spin Hall current in the material. A selectively high blue to ultraviolet light absorption and a refractive index comparable to flint glass open up the possible applicability of this material for optoelectronic devices. From electronic structural point of view, we investigate the reason behind its moderately high Seebeck coefficient and power factor comparable to traditional thermoelectric materials. Besides its narrow bandgap, relatively smaller work function of C$_{17}$Ge ($4.361 ~eV$) than graphene ($4.390 ~eV$) and germanene ($4.682 ~eV$) assures more easily removal of electron from the surface. This material is turned out to be an excellent alternative for futuristic semiconductor application from optical to thermal device regime.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.