Paper detail

Electronic excitations in quasi-2D crystals: What theoretical quantities are relevant to experiment?

The ab initio theory of electronic excitations in atomically thin [quasi-two-dimensional (Q2D)] crystals presents extra challenges in comparison to both the bulk and purely 2D cases. We argue that the conventionally used energy-loss function $-$Im $1/ε({\bf q},ω)$ (where $ε$, ${\bf q}$, and $ω$ are the dielectric function, the momentum, and the energy transfer, respectively) is not, generally speaking, the suitable quantity for the interpretation of the electron-energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) in the Q2D case, and we construct different functions pertinent to the EELS experiments on Q2D crystals. Secondly, we emphasize the importance and develop a convenient procedure of the elimination of the spurious inter-layer interaction inherent to the use of the 3D super-cell method for the calculation of excitations in Q2D crystals. Thirdly, we resolve the existing controversy in the interpretation of the so-called $π$ and $π+σ$ excitations in monolayer graphene by demonstrating that both dispersive collective excitations (plasmons) and non-dispersive single-particle (inter-band) transitions fall in the same energy ranges, where they strongly influence each other.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.