Paper detail

Electronic Excitations from a Perturbative LDA+GdW Approach

We discuss an efficient approach to excited electronic states within ab-initio many-body perturbation theory (MBPT). Quasiparticle corrections to density-functional theory result from the difference between metallic and non-metallic dielectric screening. They are evaluated as a small perturbation to the DFT-LDA band structure, rather than fully calculating the self energy and evaluating its difference from the exchange-correlation potential. The dielectric screening is desribed by a model, which applies to bulk crystals, as well as, to systems of reduced dimension, like molecules, surfaces, interfaces, and more. The approach also describes electron-hole interaction. The resulting electronic and optical spectra are slightly less accurate but much faster to calculate than a full MBPT calculation. We discuss results for bulk silicon and argon, for the Si(111)-(2x1) surface, the SiH4 molecule, an argon-aluminum interface, and liquid argon.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.