Paper detail

Electronic and nuclear contributions in sub-GeV dark matter scattering: A case study with hydrogen

Scattering of sub-GeV dark matter (DM) particles with hydrogen atoms is studied in this paper. The interactions of DM with electrons and nucleons are both included and formulated in a general framework based on nonrelativistic effective field theory. On the assumption of same dark matter coupling strengths, it is found that DM-electron interactions dominate the inelastic atomic transitions to discrete excited states and ionization continuum around the threshold regions, and DM-nucleon interactions become more important with increasing energy and dominate in elastic scattering. The conclusion should apply, qualitatively, to practical detector species so that electronic and nuclear contributions in DM scattering processes can be disentangled, while issues including binding effects and recoil mechanism in many-body systems will require further detailed calculations.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.