Paper detail

Electron response to radiation under linear acceleration: classical, QED and accelerated frame predictions

A model detector undergoing constant, infinite-duration acceleration converges to an equilibrium state described by the Hawking-Unruh temperature $T_a=(a/2π)(\hbar/c)$. To relate this prediction to experimental observables, a point-like charged particle, such as an electron, is considered in place of the model detector. Instead of the detector's internal degree of freedom, the electron's low-momentum fluctuations in the plane transverse to the acceleration provide a degree of freedom and observables which are compatible with the symmetry and thermalize by interaction with the radiation field. General arguments in the accelerated frame suggest thermalization and a fluctuation-dissipation relation but leave underdetermined the magnitude of either the fluctuation or the dissipation. Lab frame analysis reproduces the radiation losses, described by the classical Lorentz-Abraham-Dirac equation, and reveals a classical stochastic force. We derive the fluctuation-dissipation relation between the radiation losses and stochastic force as well as equipartitation $\langle p_\perp^2\rangle = 2mT_a$ from classical electrodynamics alone. The derivation uses only straightforward statistical definitions to obtain the dissipation and fluctuation dynamics. Since high accelerations are necessary for these dynamics to become important, we compare classical results for the relaxation and diffusion times to strong-field quantum electrodynamics results. We find that experimental realization will require development of more precise observables. Even wakefield accelerators, which offer the largest linear accelerations available in the lab, will require improvement over current technology as well as high statistics to distinguish an effect.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.