Paper detail

Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of Mn in Bi$_2$Se$_3$ Topological Insulator

Electron paramagnetic resonance was used to investigate Mn impurity in Bi$_2$Se$_3$ topological insulator grown by the vertical Bridgman method. Mn in high-spin S = 5/2, Mn$^2$$^+$ configuration, was detected regardless of the conductivity type of the host material. This means that Mn$^2$$^+$(d$^5$) energy level is located within the valence band, and Mn$^1$$^+$(d$^6$) energy level is outside the energy gap of Bi$_2$Se$_3$. The electron paramagnetic resonance spectrum of Mn$^2$$^+$ in Bi$_2$Se$_3$ is characterized by the isotropic g-factor |g| = 1.91 and large axial parameter D = -4.20 GHz x h. This corresponds to the zero-field splitting of the Kramers doublets equal to 8.4 GHz x h and 16.8 GHz x h, respectively, which is comparable to the Zeeman splitting for the X-band. Mn in Bi$_2$Se$_3$ acts as an acceptor, effectively reducing native-high electron concentration, compensating selenium vacancies, and resulting in p-type conductivity.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.