Paper detail

Electron-ion and ion-ion potentials for modeling warm-dense-matter: applications to laser-heated or shock-compressed Al and Si

The pair-interactions U_{ij}(r) determine the thermodynamics and linear transport properties of matter via the pair-distribution functions (PDFs), i.e., g_{ij}(r). Great simplicity is achieved if U_{ij}(r) could be directly used to predict material properties via classical simulations, avoiding many-body wavefunctions. Warm dense matter (WDM) is encountered in quasi-equilibria where the electron temperature $T_e$ differs from the ion temperature T_i, as in laser-heated or in shock-compressed matter. The electron PDFs g_{ee}(r) as perturbed by the ions are used to evaluate fully non-local exchange-correlation corrections to the free energy, using Hydrogen as an example. Electron-ion potentials for ions with a bound core are discussed with Al and Si as examples, for WDM with T_e \ne T_i, and valid for times shorter than the electron-ion relaxation time. In some cases the potentials develop attractive regions, and then become repulsive and `Yukawa-like' for higher $T_e$. These results clarify the origin of initial phonon-hardening and rapid release. Pair-potentials for shock-heated WDM show that phonon hardening would not occur in most such systems. Defining meaningful quasi-equilibrium static transport coefficients consistent with the dynamic values is addressed. There seems to be no meaningful `static conductivity' obtainable by extrapolating experimental or theoretical σ(ω, T_i, T_e) to ω\to 0, unless T_i \to T_e as well. Illustrative calculations of quasi-static resistivities R(T_i,T_e) of laser-heated as well as shock-heated Aluminum and Silicon are presented using our pseudopotentials, pair-potentials and classical integral equations. The quasi-static resistivities display clear differences in their temperature evolutions, but are not the strict ω\to 0 limits of the dynamic values.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.