Paper detail

Electron-impact ionization of atomic hydrogen from near threshold to high energies

Application of the convergent close-coupling (CCC) method to electron-impact ionization of the ground state of atomic hydrogen is considered at incident energies of 15.6, 17.6, 20, 25, 27.2, 30, 54.4, 150 and 250 eV. Total through to fully differential cross sections are presented. Following the analysis of Stelbovics [submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. (physics/9905020)] the equal-energy sharing cross sections are calculated using a solely coherent combination of total-spin-dependent ionization amplitudes, which are found to be simply a factor of two greater than the incoherent combination suggested by Bray and Fursa [1996 Phys. Rev. A {\bf 54}, 2991]. As a consequence, the CCC theory is particularly suited to the equal-energy-sharing kinematical region, and is able to obtain convergent absolute scattering amplitudes, fully ab initio. This is consistent with the step-function hypothesis of Bray [1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 78}, 4721], and indicates that at equal-energy-sharing the CCC amplitudes converge to half the step size. Comparison with experiment is satisfactory in some cases and substantial discrepancies are identified in others. The discrepancies are generally unpredictable and some internal inconsistencies in the experimental data are identified. Accordingly, new (e,2e) measurements are requested.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.