Paper detail

Electron Heating in Quasi-Perpendicular Shocks

Seventy crossings of the Earths bow shock by the THEMIS satellites have been used to study thermal electron heating in collisionless, quasi-perpendicular shocks. It was found that the temperature increase of thermal electrons differed from the magnetic field increase by factors as great as three, that the parallel electron temperature increase was not produced by parallel electric fields, and that the parallel and perpendicular electron temperature increases were the same on the average. It was also found that the perpendicular and parallel electron heating occurred simultaneously so that the isotropization time is the same as the heating time. These results cannot be explained by energy transfer from waves to electrons or by the motion of magnetized electrons through the shock. Electric field fluctuations on the scale of the electron gyro-diameter were found to be of finite amplitude in the shock ramp, which requires that the electron trajectories be more random and chaotic than orderly and adiabatic. The data may be explained by the large amplitude electric field fluctuations that demagnetize electrons as they move through the cross-shock electric field

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.