Paper detail

Electron Heating During Magnetic Reconnection: A Simulation Scaling Study

Electron bulk heating during magnetic reconnection with symmetric inflow conditions is examined using kinetic particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations. The degree of electron heating is well correlated with the inflowing Alfvén speed $c_{Ar}$ based on the reconnecting magnetic field through the relation $ΔT_e = 0.033 \,m_i\,c_{Ar}^2$, where $ΔT_{e}$ is the increase in electron temperature. For the range of simulations performed, the heating shows almost no correlation with inflow total temperature $T_{tot} = T_i + T_e$ or plasma $β$. An out-of-plane (guide) magnetic field of similar magnitude to the reconnecting field does not affect the total heating, but it does quench perpendicular heating, with almost all heating being in the parallel direction. These results are qualitatively consistent with a recent statistical survey of electron heating in the dayside magnetopause, which also found that $ΔT_e$ was proportional to the inflowing Alfvén speed. The net electron heating varies very little with distance downstream of the x-line. The simulations show at most a very weak dependence of electron heating on the ion to electron mass ratio. In the antiparallel reconnection case, the largely parallel heating is eventually isotropized downstream due a scattering mechanism such as stochastic particle motion or instabilities. The study highlights key properties that must be satisfied by an electron heating mechanism: (1) Preferential heating in the parallel direction; (2) Heating proportional to $m_i\,c_{Ar}^2$; (3) At most a weak dependence on electron mass; and (4) An exhaust electron temperature that varies little with distance from the x-line.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.