Paper detail

Electron heat conduction in the solar wind: transition from Spitzer-Härm to the collisionless limit

We use a statistically significant set of measurements to show that the field-aligned electron heat flux $q_\parallel$ in the solar wind at 1 AU is consistent with the Spitzer-Härm collisional heat flux $q_{sh}$ for temperature gradient scales larger than a few mean free paths $L_T \gtrsim 3.5 ~λ_{fp}$. This represents about 65% of the measured data and corresponds primarily to high $β$, weakly collisional plasma ('slow solar wind'). In the more collisionless regime $λ_{fp}/L_T \gtrsim 0.28$, the electron heat flux is limited to $q_\parallel/q_0 \sim 0.3$, independent of mean free path, where $q_0$ is the 'free-streaming' value; the measured $q_\parallel$ does not achieve the full $q_0$. This constraint $q_\parallel/q_0 \sim 0.3$ might be attributed to wave-particle interactions, an interplanetary electric potential, or inherent flux limitation. We also show a $β_e$ dependence to these results that is consistent with a local radial electron temperature profile $T_e \sim r^{-α}$ that is a function of the thermal electron beta $α= α(β_e)$ and that the $β$ dependence of the collisionless regulation constraint is not obviously consistent with a whistler heat flux instability. We discuss the results in a broader astrophysical context.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.