Paper detail

Electron Distribution in the Galactic Disk - Results From a Non-Equilibrium Ionization Model of the ISM

Using three-dimensional non-equilibrium ionization (NEI) hydrodynamical simulation of the interstellar medium (ISM), we study the electron density, $n_{e}$, in the Galactic disk and compare it with the values derived from dispersion measures towards pulsars with known distances located up to 200 pc on either side of the Galactic midplane. The simulation results, consistent with observations, can be summarized as follows: (i) the DMs in the simulated disk lie between the maximum and minimum observed values, (ii) the log <n_e> derived from lines of sight crossing the simulated disk follows a Gaussian distribution centered at μ=-1.4 with a dispersion σ=0.21, thus, the Galactic midplane <n_e>=0.04\pm 0.01$ cm$^{-3}$, (iii) the highest electron concentration by mass (up to 80%) is in the thermally unstable regime (200<T<10^{3.9} K), (iv) the volume occupation fraction of the warm ionized medium is 4.9-6%, and (v) the electrons have a clumpy distribution along the lines of sight.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.